Was it inappropriate for the GOP to parade Bristol Palin’s lifestyle at their convention?

Posted by admin on October 21st, 2009 and filed under convention at | 25 Comments »

Bristol Palin has chosen to have babies with young unmarried teen boys and then deny the baby a father. Is that really a lifestyle we should have highlighted at the GOP Convention? Wouldn’t it have been better to just let her learn morals and values in private?

It was the liberals who were making a big deal about it. All the Palins were doing was showing that they were not about to hide from the sleazy media and their liberal allies.

25 Responses

  1. BROCK PETERS Says:

    I’d love to tap dat @ss! BUMBLAKKA BIG BOOTY Y’ALL!
    References :

  2. consrgreat Says:

    So as a liberal your saying all unwed mothers should hide in shame?
    Bristol made her decision to have the baby and deemed it AS NOT A PUNISHMENT as your messiah has said it is….
    References :

  3. Ministry Of Information Says:

    A lesson to any politician selling "family values"

    Don’t do it if you can’t live up to it.
    References :

  4. Ted L Says:

    Liberals dump billions in welfare for women with worse beliefs that her. Sp I make a deal with ya… you keep Obammy off my TV for a stinkin day (Must he constantly be on TV reading that dang teleprompter!) and we will tell the Palin family you would rather not see them for a while. Is that a deal? That must be the only single mom the Liberals don’t try to bribe with welfare for a vote though.
    References :

  5. BERNIE MADOFF WITH MY MONEY! Says:

    It’s Democrats who made a big deal out of a pregnant teenager. They are just angry that she won’t be a supporter of them or on welfare. People like Bristol are usually a lock vote for the Democrats but her situation angers them because she will not be on the dark side.
    References :

  6. brian2412 Says:

    It was the liberals who were making a big deal about it. All the Palins were doing was showing that they were not about to hide from the sleazy media and their liberal allies.
    References :

  7. You asked so... Says:

    Parade Bristol Palin’s lifestyle? They couldn’t ignore her pregnancy so they had to deal with it. Bristol only has one baby and unfortunately, out of wedlock births isn’t anything new. Yes, this should have been a private
    matter.
    References :

  8. February1 Says:

    It was probably not well thought out. Bristol Palin can not have been comfortable with the sudden and unflattering attention.

    Oh, listen to the hypocrites on the Right! This from people who trashed every member of the Obama family no matter how distant. It was Obama (not the Palins) who seemed to be thinking of Bristol. He told people the Palin family should be off limits.
    References :

  9. delina_m Says:

    That is called "real life". Life is what it is not what you’d like it to be.

    A better thing to do for any party would be to educate the young and not to expect them to do something most can’t (abstinence). You can’t stop people from having sex but you can show them intelligent ways to do it.

    She was a great example of what NOT to do.
    References :

  10. I love being RIGHT! Says:

    Did you forget about Bill Clinton and John Edwards?
    References :

  11. VegasYooper Says:

    Why are so many pablum puking liberals still yakking about Bristol Palin? That’s what I want to know.
    References :

  12. City of the Blind Says:

    Behavior is not a lifestyle.
    References :

  13. Mephisto Says:

    She is ‘underage’ and Mr/Mrs Palin therefore are unwillingly glamorizing teen pregnancy. In so displaying her in Public is an invite for critique by the Moral Police.
    References :
    Requirement for Moral Critique – Common Sense

  14. LIFE IS ABOUT CHANGE!!! Says:

    It is just the way it is in America folks

    People need to wake up & realize Morals mean nothing any longer

    The kids will just Continue on a downward spiral

    I think we can Thank BOOZE & DRUGS for our demise

    Everyone is either a drunk or a druggie

    What are you?

    KIDS DON’T STAND A CHANCE
    References :

  15. mike b Says:

    Yes. This was what I thought at the time.
    References :

  16. bmoc2525 Says:

    So if it were you, you would have hid her and then been called hypocrite for hiding and being embarrassed.

    It was a catch 22, damned if they did and damned if they didn’t.

    I am proud of my family no matter what the situation and so was Palin. Don’t try to play the hindsight is 20/20 game as we can always see the problems after the fact. She made a choice and whether you or anyone else has a problem with it, it really boils down to none of your business.
    References :

  17. scredawg Says:

    Seems to me it was the liberal media that started parading her around first, with a bunch of slanderous rumors…
    References :

  18. Doobee Says:

    What was the alternative? Hide her? Shoot her?

    You people have NO shame.

    You are OBSESSED with an 18 year old kid. You are a pathetic little troll.

    Leave her alone you loser!
    References :

  19. USA-Hole Says:

    babies? young unmarried teen boys?

    a) she had A baby

    b) i’m glad she chose to have a relationship with an unmarried boy. adultery is wrong.

    c.) she had ONE baby with ONE boy.

    and i don’t care about bristol palin. :D
    References :

  20. racism is unbecoming Says:

    She had one baby with one young man. She’s human, as we all are. It was brave of Bristol to attend the convention. She deserves kudos for it. And really, do you honestly believe that attempting to "hide" her pregnancy would have worked? I’m a liberal and I see nothing negative in her attending. Somehow, I suspect you are no Republican. This kind of stuff will not heal our nation.
    References :

  21. Retta Says:

    Yes it would have been better if she had "killed" her unborn child instead of giving it a chance at life! You must have a very sorry life if the best you can do is pick on a teenager and her unborn child just because you don’t like her mothers politics!
    References :

  22. celebrate Says:

    She chose to go on fox & give a 2 or 3 part interview with Greta Van Sustren. She told that her mother was pro-choice when it came to her having a choice but she chose to have the baby. Which is what many young people do cause they are clueless as to what that really means in the grand scheme of their life. So now Sarah has 2 babies at home. We all know that the other one was her other daughter’s baby cause the fact that her daughter was hidden in the house during that time & supposed to have mono is BS. Plus, Sarah never looked pregnant & not even her sisters, parents no one knew she was pregnant. So good for the GOP for allowing another embarrassment to their downfall. She is a great role model for the republican families. She says abstinence is not realistic.
    References :

  23. cjhutch Says:

    I don’t think it was "immoral" per se, it was their choice although she will learn either way. But, it is ridiculous to do so and then when the inevitable break up occurs between Bristol and the boyfriend expect the Left to not notice or pick up on it and the hypocrisy of it. I feel sorry for the kid and as much as I can’t stand Palin, it is a good thing Bristol has a loving family behind her if she is going to do this on her own. She is going to need the support!
    References :

  24. Dodo Birdy Says:

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1555601/bristol_palin_dumps_her_childs_father.html

    News reports like this one make me feel bad for Bristol, even though I am not a Republican. She seems to have been used by her mother and the GOP to push their agenda. They should not have paraded her out in public like that.
    References :

  25. ladyliberty Says:

    And why is it teen pregnancy is higher for young people from Republican families than from Democratic families?—EASY, Republican teens give the baby a chance at life. The Democratic teens don’t let the pregnancy become public knowledge, they abort. Therefore, the statistics are incorrect. It’s probably about even, it’s just some babies are allowed to live, some are not. Some pregnancies are never even known about, the baby is killed.
    References :

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.